
NextGen Rights Defenders
Discover who are the architects of digital civilizations.
Engaging the correct stakeholders
In the efforts to ensure that technology is designed and build in ways that are protective of citizens and their digital twins, the most important actor is largely non-engaged: Technologists.
They are the people tasked to architect and build the technology everyone is so much concerned about and yet they occupy, on a practical level, a marginal space in the whole conversation.
Challenges
Technologists are the people designing and building the technology everyone is so concerned about.
Technologists face a number of challenges that are stopping them from taking an active role in architecting and building better and safer digital spaces. Until these challenges aren't addressed, they will largely remain external actors and not embrace their role as NextGen Rights Defenders.
TIOF has identified the following challenges:
Challenge 1: Lack of taxonomies
Why: Without a common, clear, technical language describing Digital Harms or Digital Rights it is impossible for a technologist to envision what are the repercussions of technology to both citizens and their digital twins.
Challenge 2: Lack of financial incentives
Why: Civil Society does not have comparable financial means as Corporate or Governments. The lack of career advancement rewards can't be appealing when the alternatives can be very lucrative; even more so when debt is introduced in the equation.
Challenge 3: Lack of tools and knowledge to become that change
Why: Minimizing frictions for technologists will scale their adoption of their role as NextGen Rights Defenders.
Supporting the NextGen Rights Defenders
DCDR Principles
While the UDDR is still a work in progress, The IO Foundation has created the DCDR Principles to act upon Challenge 1 and guide developers to update some of their paradigms and stepping up as NextGen Rights Defenders.
See more information in the DCDR Advocacy documentation.
Last updated
Was this helpful?

